Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Sir Royalty Income Fund SIRZF


Primary Symbol: T.SRV.UN

SIR Royalty Income Fund (the Fund) holds investment in SIR Corp (SIR). The Funds' investment, SIR is engaged in the business of owning and operating full-service restaurants in Canada. SIR has concept restaurant brands, including Jack Astor’s Bar and Grill, Scaddabush Italian Kitchen & Bar, and Canyon Creek Chop House, signature restaurant brands, such as Reds Wine Tavern, Reds Midtown Tavern... see more

TSX:SRV.UN - Post Discussion

Sir Royalty Income Fund > Closure of 3 Restaurants...
View:
Post by BlueJay2020 on Feb 09, 2021 7:58pm

Closure of 3 Restaurants...

All at Yonge and Gerrard - another of those 'favourable opportunities' to exit. One is a Scaddabush, one is a Reds, and the other a Duke's (not part of the Royalty pool).
I guess to the extent that it reduces leverage it's a good thing, although the pool is getting smaller and smaller....

No mention of anything offer-related in the press release.  And I have had no response from IR to my enquiries.  No surprise!
Comment by babedinkleman on Feb 09, 2021 8:30pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by logicandinertia on Feb 09, 2021 8:42pm
Shrinking the pool is not great, especially in high throughput locations like this.   As unit holders, there is the adjustment (reduction in class a units) in Jan 2022 to account for this, but that is a one time adjustment, whereas thriving restaurants help to pay dividends for years to come.   If Fowler elects to rebrand and not vend in new brands to the pool, it isn't ...more  
Comment by BlueJay2020 on Feb 09, 2021 10:35pm
The timing of this announcement is also interesting - pushing the adjustment to units back a year, as well as just 2 days before Jane's offer deadline.  Will this announcement push more people to accept Jane's offer - if so, that wouldn't seem to be good for Sir Corp. As has been said, this is a very messy situation and all kinds of levers that Sir Corp can pull.  We're ...more  
Comment by jcw604 on Feb 09, 2021 11:58pm
This should turn out to be good. See: The COVID-19 pandemic has drastically altered SIR's operating environment and put a great deal of stress on many businesses, including SIR. SIR's landlord presented the Company with an unexpected but mutually beneficial opportunity to vacate these properties as the landlord had a unique opportunity to lease the space to another tenant for a non ...more  
Comment by babedinkleman on Feb 10, 2021 1:18am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by flamingogold on Feb 10, 2021 8:19am
These businesses were mandated to close, I would not be surprised to hear of additional federal funds to help bail out both parties, restuarants owners and landlords. While it is sad to see closures, it should be no surprise that these are all in the downtown core, the hardest hit areas for all cities around the globe. The royalty pool will shrink, but in the end even a small distribution  ...more  
Comment by jcw604 on Feb 10, 2021 9:16am
How can you not know about the unpaid rents? They are all in the financial report? Even if they managed to negotiate with their landlord to defer their rent, it will still show up as liability in their report. If the have a positive ebitda, that means that they are not really losing money, but their older loan interests and the marking down of assets value is troubling them. They probably have ...more  
Comment by Robsopinion on Feb 10, 2021 9:13am
The rents in downtown locations are for sure over 100k per month.  I have also reached out to contacts at Sir. No response from the exec level. 
Comment by babedinkleman on Feb 10, 2021 10:00am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by tkirk62 on Feb 10, 2021 10:44am
Does nobody check the financial statements around here? Rent expense for SIR Corp is $16 millionish a year, or $1.4 millionish a month. Divide that by 54 locations and you have the average rent expense as about $26,000 per location. Sure the downtown Toronto locations will be higher than that, but of course they aren't $100,000/mth. 
Comment by babedinkleman on Feb 10, 2021 10:55am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by tkirk62 on Feb 10, 2021 11:36am
It actually is fairly clear how much rent SIR has paid. When looking at SIR Corp's financias (not Sir Royalty's), just Ctrl f for the term "cash outflow" to see how much SIR has been paying for its lease expenses. You'll see the deferred rent is not a huge amount. 
Comment by jcw604 on Feb 10, 2021 11:38am
Deferred rent are liability. They must report it in their financial statement, until they are pardon, or in this case their lease is being buy back by the landlord.
Comment by jcw604 on Feb 10, 2021 11:41am
They probably just lump them all to their liability, if you don't see a separate category for it.
Comment by logicandinertia on Feb 10, 2021 10:58am
Agreed.  And you can see the actual rent paid thru the cash flow statement from sir Corp in financing activities.   They paid $4.4 million last quarter, and adjustments for lease abatements is just $65k in the notes.   to qualify for the govt rent subsidy, they have to pay the rent .   Which gets to the point that not being franchised has been an enormous disadvantage for ...more  
Comment by logicandinertia on Feb 10, 2021 11:03am
So if I wasn't clear, it looks like much of the rent is being paid by sir corp. 
Comment by Robsopinion on Feb 10, 2021 12:29pm
I'm not sure if anyone has experience with commercial leases, and more specifically restaurant leases, but my numbers are not a random guess.  How were they profitable? Volume. Those front street locations simply did massive volume.  not looking for an argument, just adding info from my personal experience. 
Comment by tkirk62 on Feb 10, 2021 12:42pm
The lease numbers are reported. I'm not saying that you were guessing, but your estimate was way off. Like I said, SIR pays $1.4 million a month in rent for 54 restaurants. Even if we assumed $0 rent for every restaurant outside of Toronto, SIR's Toronto (19) locations would only be paying on average $73,700/month in rent. So your estimate that the downtown locations are "for sure ...more  
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities