RE:RE:Nice article HedgeHey Hedge:
Since you also complain and debate I don`t feel bad,only thing is I miss the Big Picture so far,I see a whole bunch of squares,I must be on checkerboard format.
We have to assume and hope again that the execution,timing,luck and the roll out are successful.
I love to debate but really there`s not much of it lately,I think the board still shocked of what happened after such long wait and preparation,as far as complaining,there`s not one person on this board that doesn`t complain at one time or another.
In the space of two months we had three excellent PRs and a CC,not complaining there,but there`s complaining about the results thereafter about the lack of clarity-uncomplete again with the LG PR and the SP performance.
I explained yesterday why I felt this way and I`m not going to repeat it.
Going back to your post and assuming we are at the same market value in Q2-Q3 we are a failure.
Then as far as somebody taking a run at a cheap badly run Company it`s possible,all the ingredients are there to make it successful.
There`s a big task ahead,how much help and how much money will it take,who knows.
We had good people and we let them go,now we are subcontracting everything and by experience I `m telling you that that is a big job, you are trusting somebody that you can`t control,and like the Dave would say that`s a fact,so we need luck there..
To be honest I rather have the Big Houses pump or try to raise the SP ,do some exciting things and try to sell it before at a better deal if that would be what would happen (assuming).
We are too small and inexperienced,no key people or money,we get ripped off at every deal and we end up paying the bills like big shots,besides the fact that we are giving our content and technology for a song.
Everything changes too fast,but not SIO.
So all this is assuming your prediction.
You forgot to include assumption in your post.
Cheers old buddy.