Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

St Andrew Goldfields Ord STADF



OTCPK:STADF - Post by User

Comment by SASFanon Jan 08, 2016 5:30pm
353 Views
Post# 24441917

RE:How bout that Taylor grade!

RE:How bout that Taylor grade!The grade beat has huge implications if it is consistent going forward. It essentially comes out to a 20% increase in gold production with no corresponding increase in expenses. 

Management claims Taylor will cost about C$135/tonne to mine, transport and process. There's a 2% royalty on the mine. Recovery should come in around 95%.

I'm assuming a USD/CAD exchange rate of 1.40 (currently 1.42).

At 6.27g/t, I was coming out with mine cash costs of US$525/oz. 

At 7.55g/t, it comes out to US$425/oz. This is ridiculously low. 

At 200K tonnes milled annually (4Q run-rate was 275K tonnes), Taylor produces 44K ounces per year and has a "cash margin from mine operations" of C$40MM annually. To put that in perspective, Holt produced C$30MM of "cash margin from operations" through 3Q15. 

Once up and running, Taylor should have significantly lower CAPEX needs than Holt. 

Taylor could be a cash cow going forward. 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>