Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Sandstorm Metals & Energy Ltd STTYF



GREY:STTYF - Post by User

Comment by zentrarianNZon Oct 24, 2013 6:17am
376 Views
Post# 21844120

RE:RE:RE:For Those Who Invested in SLW Since the Beginning...

RE:RE:RE:For Those Who Invested in SLW Since the Beginning...You're right in suggesting that NW didn't have much experience in metals and energy streaming. After all, nobody did. That's why he brought onboard (if somewhat belatedly) the best people he could find in the industry to help make those decisions. There may also have been a degree of hubris involved, based on such extraordinary success with PM streaming, and perhaps an overly optimistic view of how readily that would translate into the extremely competitive, much more top-heavy basic metals and energy industries.

But much if not most of SM&E's current state comes down to misjudging the timing in a very cyclical and macro-economicly driven industry. Things could easily have gone the other way, and we'd no doubt be singing management's praises right now. That's not to excuse the mistakes, which the company has acknowledged and will undoubtedly learn hard-won lessons from. But in my view it wasn't so much "bad decisions" as it was pursuing too much reward at the expense of keeping the risk contained, especially the macro-economic risk. (Not unlike the Oyu Tolgoi deal, which even if it turns out to be very profitable, I will still consider to have been too politically risky.)

I suspect the "lull" you refer to is in part caused by a reluctance to raise more capital until profitability (and the resultant sp) improves, and a lack of potential partners that can provide both certainty of survival and attractive terms in the current environment. In the future, SM&E is going to be a lot more conservative in choosing its partners, and presumably rely a lot less on dubious "guarantees" and clawback provisions to contain risk. That should make for a far less exciting, but ultimately more profitable investment.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse