Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

SilverCrest Mines Inc SVLC



NYSEAM:SVLC - Post by User

Post by shermandrockon Jan 22, 2013 11:46am
384 Views
Post# 20872210

Folks: An interesting observation

Folks: An interesting observation

Insofar as production is a function of the gross ounces placed on the pad, the future production should benefit greatly from the Q4 pad placements of silver.

 

Firstly, the grade was 59.59 gpt and 591K ozs were placed on the pad.

 

Different ores leach at different times. i have read in some NRs for various (names currently escape me) companies where by they state " within x months, x% of the ore placed on the pad is recovered". As such, the 4Q production is a function of all materials placed on the pad (presumably they continue to treat all of the oer, who knows) since the beginning of time with the bulk being from the mosyt recent quarters.

 

That was a long-winded way of saying that we can expect increased production as increased grades and ounce quantities are added to the leachpad.

 

Yes indeed.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>