Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bullboard - Stock Discussion Forum Technologies Sonomax Inc SXHHF

Sonomax Technologies Inc engages in the development, commercialization and sales of intra-ear technology for earphones, hearing protection, hearing enhancement, and other communication applications.

GREY:SXHHF - Post Discussion

Technologies Sonomax Inc > CNSX = Low Volume + Low Exposure
View:
Post by CurlyMick on May 09, 2013 11:26am

CNSX = Low Volume + Low Exposure

Ice;

 

I've been through de-listing before. IMHO you're broker is either pumping this play or he doesn't know what he's talking about. On the CNSX, the company's reporting requirements are near zilch. Shareholders will get much less info and news than we get now, if that's possible.

 

Just look at the amount of volume on the CNSX daily. Hardly anyone cares about these companies. It's hard enough to get attention on the Venture these days.

 

Here's advice to start-up companies that are looking to raise capital. It suggests listing on the CNSX as a starting point;

 

https://www.cbj.ca/legal/dec10_legal/index.1.html

 

A company with a 381million share float usually goes up the food chain, not down.

 

Just keep your eyes open. I would never and didn't advise you to sell at .01 or any price. That is definitely your personal decision and up to you only. I'm just providing information that I know or believe. I hope that my view is wrong, but I doubt it is.

 

Here's hoping the company will tell us the facts and truth about it's so-called relationship with Value Link and other OEM, etc arrangements. But given their history of poor execution, I am guessing that there really is nothing to tell. We already heard Malouf apologize at the last AGM for poor execution.

 

IMHO barring a miracle, this company is seeking protection soon. Fortunately I am a very small shareholder now. Unfortunately I don't have any right to sharing in the IP. I hope some here got protection of sorts in one of the many private placements deals the company made.

 

GLTA

Comment by mcgillstocks on May 09, 2013 12:34pm
Do you think they will complete a REVERSE SPLIT at this point?
Comment by wdr2 on May 09, 2013 6:29pm
Look Mcgoo the stock is trading a a f'"in penny .Leave it alone. wdr2
Comment by mcgillstocks on May 09, 2013 6:58pm
Was this in reply to my question about a reverse split? The company was thinking of doing this for some time. You are an idi0t.
The Market Update
{{currentVideo.title}} {{currentVideo.relativeTime}}
< Previous bulletin
Next bulletin >

At the Bell logo
A daily snapshot of everything
from market open to close.

{{currentVideo.companyName}}
{{currentVideo.intervieweeName}}{{currentVideo.intervieweeTitle}}
< Previous
Next >
Dealroom for high-potential pre-IPO opportunities