Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Syntroleum Corporation SYNM



NDAQ:SYNM - Post by User

Post by fredskion Jul 06, 2010 9:56pm
657 Views
Post# 17249003

Why Shale Natural Gas Players Should Invest in GTL

Why Shale Natural Gas Players Should Invest in GTL

Why Shale Natural Gas Players Should Invest in GTL (GAS TOLIQUIDS)

Commodities/ NaturalGasJul 06, 2010 - 05:09 PM

By: Submissions

Commodities

Best Financial Markets Analysis ArticleManinder Singh Batra writes: Shale gas in the past few years, has emerged as a tough competitor to conventional natural gas due tothe massive increase in spot natural gas prices and advancement inhydraulic fracturing technology . But lately,since 2009 , there hasbeen a massive decline in the natural gas spot prices(Henry Hub) ,dueto massive glut in the natural gas market .


Most Shale gas players cannot make profit and maintain at ratesbelow 5$/Mcf , as proven by Chesapeake CEO’s Statement :
“McClendon admitted on the company’s February earnings call that $5.00per million BTU pricing on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX)equates to $3.50 gas at the wellhead, once differentials like gatheringand compression costs are included in the cost calculus. “Even $3.50gas at the wellhead does not create enough cash flow in the industry tomaintain today’s drilling price — even for the best-managed shaleplays,” he said.

Excluding takeaway-pipeline expenses (like gathering andcompression costs), Chesapeake posted, on average, production anddevelopment costs of $3.47 per Mcfe, according to the company’s 2009 annual earnings report.”

And currently , as the natural gas price chart shows that thecurrent prices are below 5$. The only reason why Shale Gas players had managed to earn profit in the first quarter of 2010,was due to hedging gains.

But , this cannot continue forever and ultimately ,the shale gasindustry will suffer losses ,if the natural gas spot prices continue toremain this low . But , there are better alternatives ,like convertingthis natural gas into synthetic diesel and Gasoline , or even syntheticlight crude using FT process to convert the gas into liquids.

Considering that the crude oil prices are hovering around 72$ ,itwill be very profitable to convert the gas into GTL Diesel, ATF ,naphtha . also there are several new GTL technologies and small scaleGTL plants coming up and these have conversion efficiencies and energy efficienciesmuch greater than conventional large scale GTL plants .

So, rather than just competing with natural gas , shale gas playersshould also invest in GTL .

By Maninder Singh Batra

maninder300@hotmail.com

© 2010 Copyright Maninder Singh Batra - All Rights Reserved

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>