Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

First Tidal Acquisition Corp T.AAA


Primary Symbol: V.AAA.P

First Tidal Acquisition Corp. is a Canada-based capital pool company. The Company is formed for the purpose of identification and evaluation of assets or businesses with a view to completing a qualifying transaction. The Company has not commenced any operations nor generated any revenue.


TSXV:AAA.P - Post by User

Comment by wpf1on Oct 23, 2012 3:35pm
135 Views
Post# 20515135

RE: RE: RE: RE: Analyst report out!!!!!

RE: RE: RE: RE: Analyst report out!!!!!

Too funny eh O...

cadaver...I suggest you belly up too the kool aid stand with your posts

Hey O did you see that report from BMO...whoa hoo nelly

Put simply, they think that the economics of Jansen are not attractive. Using a potash price of US$450 a tonne (just below current levels), they projected an internal rate of return (IRR) for Jansen of just 10%. To get to a more reasonable IRR of 12% to 15%, they calculated that a “lofty” long-term price of at least US$600 would be required.
The problem is that building Jansen could put pressure on prices, because it would bring more product into a market that is already well supplied right now. Mr. Jackson and Mr. Robson believe that potash demand is adequately covered out to the mid-2020s without Jansen. And while they wrote that the decision to build Jansen can be justified by taking a much longer-term view and focusing on the period beyond 2025, they noted that is “inherently riskier” because of the forecasting challenges

Well if that doesn`t make you toss your cookies... nothing will....have another shot o kool aid kidz

fertiman...yous dumb...lool


Read more at https://www.stockhouse.com/bullboards/messagedetail.aspx?p=0&m=31689197&l=0&r=0&s=aaa&t=list#vjre4VKX0mk4weyY.99

Bullboard Posts