First Tidal Acquisition Corp T.AAA

RE:RE:I find the parts in bold fascinating....anyone else?

[bashertrasher1]

These are the statements I have issues with (in yellow highlight). Neither one is true. So Dennis, you might think it's the "post of the weekend" but the truth is that the original post had blaring inaccuracies in it. So he has been called out. Notice that his second post is quite different from his first regarding the share price. If any of your so-called "pumpers" had posted suck blatant inaccuracies, you would be LIVID.

The truth is the stock price did NOT plummet exactly as the talks began. And it had NOT been in the "50 cent range for months and months prior to the collapse."

The reason I call it bashing is that these staements made by Cosford are FALSE.

PERIOD.

in case you are wondering, I am a long term holder of this stock although I was fortunate enough to have gotten out when it ran up and have gotten back in more recently.

cosford74 wrote: No question!!!   I brought this up immediately after the ICL deal was released.   The numbers are based off of a SP that had plummetted exactly as the talks began.   For this to be used as the "baseline" is disingenuous as best.   No different that those who are happy that AAA is up 75% from the low of 26.5 cents.  The SP had been in the 50 cent range for months and months prior to the collapse in December that forced managment to issue a statement saying nothing was happening, but now we know that they were in initial talks with ICL.   At the very least, provided managment gave any thought to existing shareholders, the three month average should have been used rather than the 52 week low.