RE:Cost per gram 92 cents for APH. For ACB+LEAF?When an LP is given the choice to supply say Alberta and its 4 million people or say Germany and its population of 83 million, which do you think is going to be catered to? Yes low cost production is vital. Thank you for ID'ing the obvious.
APH+LEAF cost/gram? Who cares? Why does this nonsense hypothetical matter at all?
Next line you are trying out poetry? Drunken sailor to gains and losses at this point in the progression of all of this? This is just some standard trolling bs.
Then again stating the obvious. You do understand that literally ever major LP has stated the importance of low cost prodduction right. Every one of them.
15%, what are you talking about? More trolling bs here
"Makes zero sense" to be in the middle of AB? Frankly this is problably the stupidest comment you have made yet. This is something to note as you routinely challenge that personal best. (Loved your "weekend research the other day and then proceed to list strains, fvcking brilliant!!!) But this is about as intentional ignorance as it gets. I am sure the low engery costs and easly access to an INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT must have slipped all your intense "research".
Frankly you are a troll.
MartialArts wrote:
APH has the cost per gram well displayed in investor material. It's 92 cents per gram. That will be important as provinces turn the screws to get the best wholesale deals.
What is the cost per gram for APH+LEAF?
It's one thing spending like a dunken sailor with shareholder money but most investors want gains, not loses.
Cost of production is something all investors should be looking at very, very carefully. APH was setup as a wholesaler. While ACB seems to want to spend a fortune in saturated small fragmented 15% limited to one company max markets like home base Alberta? It makes zero sense frankly.