RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:This Is A Good StockI do agree though that this is probably a tempest in a teapot. AC is probably trying this on for size. I would be interested to see the court documents to determine how serious it is. How big is the subsiduary? How important is it to Kognitiv? What is the wording of the clause that is alleged to have been violated? What was the alleged violation? We really need to know the answers to these questions to assess how serious this is.
Without knowing any of the above, if I had to guess I would guess that it is not very serious. Due dilligence would have been done before the merger. Something that was huge and obvious would not have been missed. This is probably is a smaller grey area that was either too small to care about, or it is such a long shot that it was thought not to be a risk.
ShockandAwww wrote: I suppose that's possible Catamaran, but its also possible that AC is being unduly scurrilous and has little ground for their interference. If I had to bet, I'd bet on that.