RE:RE:BlackBerry Has $940 Million More Money To Diversify Its SoftThis is why I posted it.
I love when we discuss and evaluate these "articles" and I hope it helps others understand how these people can write articles without much knowledge about what they are writing about..
xfybbr49gh wrote: IQ,
I don't go to SA to read their articles.
Now, it is in front of my face. It is so yucky. Give me a spoon. Another shallow, misdirection comment on BlackBerry.
"BES ad BBM Enterprise are not enough to maximize BlackBerry's potential as a SaaS provider."
Pleeease, this is revolting. BES in my mind is an ice age terminology and BBM Enterprise is not the only Software as a Service in BlackBerry!
It bets the question that how much is this guy really understand BlackBerry when he is still using "old" terminology and not talking about BlackBerry's current products?
This fellow might know how to recite a market share table. Pretending to be knowledgeable. Setting up a strawman suggesting BlackBerry must compete in that circle in order to be successful is totally rubbish!
His view is shallow, one-size fits all, no product differentiation, lack of understanding of BlackBerry's new products.
_____________________________________________________________
Articles like this is to have an attractive title to draw you in to read their manufactured negatives. They hope these wrong ideas will infitrate in the back of your mind. When it comes time for a price spike, instead of considering what the value of BlackBerry should be and hold on, you will sell your shares because it has a large % daily, weekly, monthly gain. Because you think BlackBerry can't compete in SaaS (strawman) and the price spike is not permanent.
You sell your share and you lose its potentials!
He could eb writing for a hedge fund, for clicks or for glory. All directed to your misfortune.
Garbage article like this is mind pollution!
I don't like it a single bit!!!
From now on, I even need to stop reading SA article here.
____________________________
IQ, my negative view is directed to the SA article AND NOT to you. Thanks for sharing all the time. Have a wonderful day.