RE: An article worth reading - Maher"Note the comments...and compare them to comments made by Guy in otherarticles..."
Such as...
Just telling us that your impressionis he doesn't speak as effectively as someone else might be telling us moreabout you than anyone else. That's too vague.
If you are going tocriticize someone so harshly you need to provide specific expamples of instanceswhere you disapprove. Otherwise your comments amount to little more thanproclaiming you dislike one guy more than another.
Most ot thetime things in life - including people - aren't quite as simple as the labelswe'd like to apply to them.
That's a common fallacy referred to as"black and white thinking". Regardless of the feelings they may or may notinspire in us, people are complicted. Some may have great ability to speak inpublic, some have other skills, but many, given sufficient motivation, training,along with the opportunity and conditions to do so, can perform their jobsproficiently.
Your criticisms would take on more credence if you could bemore specific. By offering particular situations in which you believe Hacheyfumbled badly your message speaks much more loudly. Just coming on the board toannounce that you like or dislike someone - however many times you repeat it -accomplishes little.
Tell us precisely why you dislike the man.
You need more than the fact that sales are down. It's hard to see how adowncycle in the industry, or in the overall economy can be all Hachey's fault.Telling us that your impression is you don't think he speaks as well as someoneelse doesn't help much either. We're all at various places on the learning curvefor a wide variety of skills.
So what if one executive isn't aspracticed at public speaking as another?
It isn't so much what an mansays, or his ability to express himself in public, that makes him a valuableasset to the company. It's things like character, honesty, ability to innovateand ability to make the right decision at the right time.