Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Bombardier Inc. T.BBD.A

Alternate Symbol(s):  BDRXF | BDRAF | BDRBF | T.BBD.B | T.BBD.PR.B | T.BBD.PR.C | T.BBD.PR.D | BDRPF | BOMBF

Bombardier Inc. is a Canada-based manufacturer of business aircraft with a global network of service centers. The Company is focused on designing, manufacturing and servicing business jets. The Company has a worldwide fleet of more than 5,000 aircraft in service with a variety of multinational corporations, charter and fractional ownership providers, governments and private individuals. It operates aerostructure, assembly and completion facilities in Canada, the United States and Mexico. Its robust customer support network services the Learjet, Challenger and Global families of aircraft, and includes facilities in strategic locations in the United States and Canada, as well as in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Switzerland, Austria, the United Arab Emirates, Singapore, China and Australia. The Company's jets include Challenger 350, Challenger 3500, Challenger 650, Global 5500, Global 6500, Global 7500 and Global 8000.


TSX:BBD.A - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by jammerhon Oct 06, 2010 10:26am
421 Views
Post# 17534375

RE: Why They'll Might Not Re-engine

RE: Why They'll Might Not Re-engine"There are some good reasons to suspect that Boeing and perhaps even Airbus will not re-engine.  For the Boeing 737, the wings are too low to the ground for the GTF engines and they have made it know that the economics are not quite there to justify a clean sheet design."

Yes, and a new design would take more years to develop. Even then it would only succeed in getting them to market with a "me too" product which usually isn't good enough when it comes to justifying a completely new redesign. For that the've been waiting for newer engine technology in the form of the "open rotor", however, that isn't expected to be ready until somewhere around 2020.

Even then Pratt and Whitney expects to have an improved GTF ready by that time which will be as efficient as the OR concept  - or, I should say, as efficient as the open rotor concept is hoped to become.

"C Series has a clear advantage due to its use of lighter materials and a lower thrust engine.  Even if Airbus goes for a GTF it will need the higher thrust og the PW1400 which will cost more and use more fuel than the C series PW 1521G.  If the C series still has a 10% fuel savings advantage over a re-engined A320 and it comes to market 3 years earlier, it might not be worth it to the airlines to go with Airbus just for a common fleet.  Airbus has to be looking at the numbers carefully and wondering if they too should not just wait until 2020 for the new technologies to mature "

I hear you. Yes, CSeries has a certain advantage. How much of an advantage isn't clear. A lot depends on how effectively Airbus, or Boeing can adjust the GTF to their current models - assuming only minor design changes.

Many factors will come into play here for each manufacturer and each customer. Things like the cost of fuel, how soon aircraft can be delivered, range, ease and cost of maintenance, noise levels, and environmental concerns can be important considerations for some airline customers.

It seems reasonable to expect each manufaturer will do what it can to retain, or take market share and it's reasonable to expect each will see some success in that regard.

At the moment too much depends on unpredictable factors to make a concise estimate. In any evnent, CSeries should do well enough just knocking the socks off Embraer's E190. But the beauty of this program is that it can be extended beyond the CS 100 and CS300 to the over 150-to-190 category. This gives it even greater potential.

Whether CSeries blows them away or eventually establishes itself with only moderate sales success, it's a vital step for the company towards the building of larger, lighter, cleaner, more fuel-efficient aircraft.







Bullboard Posts