Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Bombardier Inc. T.BBD.A

Alternate Symbol(s):  BDRXF | BDRAF | BDRBF | T.BBD.B | T.BBD.PR.B | T.BBD.PR.C | BOMBF | T.BBD.PR.D | BDRPF

Bombardier Inc. is focused on designing, manufacturing, and servicing business jets. The Company has a fleet of approximately 5,000 aircraft in service with a wide variety of multinational corporations, charter and fractional ownership providers, governments, and private individuals. The Company designs, develops, manufactures and markets two families of business jets (Challenger and Global), spanning from the mid-size to large categories. The Company also provides aftermarket support for both of these aircraft, as well as for the Learjet family of aircraft. The Company's robust customer support network services the Learjet, Challenger, and Global families of aircraft, and includes facilities in strategic locations in the United States and Canada, as well as in the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Switzerland, Italy, Austria, The United Arab Emirates, Singapore, China and Australia. Its jets include Challenger 300, Challenger 350, Challenger 3500, Global 5000, Global 5500, Global 6000.


TSX:BBD.A - Post by User

Comment by BBDB859on Apr 25, 2022 11:22pm
153 Views
Post# 34630985

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Bombardier Alstom Statement re: BT

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Bombardier Alstom Statement re: BTYes you're right Ralph. I do get excited when I'm dealing with idiots like PB. In the end you're right that our SP went up 200% while theirs went down 20 - 30%. But don't underestimate the train business they'll catch up when they turn BT profitable. You're right on having nothing to lose here either. Those funds are ours to lose. Maybe we'll get those funds sooner than later because it's our money. Yes we need investment here for the SP to go up. Cheers


raphaelle2 wrote: Hey take it easy 859! No point to waste energy on this. First, look at both groups market value. during the last year: Alstom lost 25% while we gained 40%. So, quite possible that one feel robbed while the other relieved! Great feast for both corporate lawyers groups. They only risk for us is a distraction in the 5 yrs recovery plan, and an excuse for hesitant investors to jump in. This too will pass like many others hurdles. GLTA.
BBDB859 wrote: Hey Nobody.

I see this all the time. When a company is in the wrong? They sue the other one for anything they can find. Or everyone involved in the deal. For sure what happened here is that Bombardier asked for the closing money from Alstom, and threatened to sue Alstom Recently if they didn't pay up. So Alstom is choosing arbitration to settle claim and claiming that Bombardier owes them money.to defend their position, hoping that the Arbitrator will offset the Bomber claim against Alstom. Alstom doesn't have a leg to stand IMHO. I followed the closing deal, and posted at the time of closing that the Bomber was probably short changed on  Inventory, which is paid separate on closing. Or Alstom wanted the idiot Bomber to solve all the Legacy problems with Bombardier's money. What thieves. They not only wanted the company cheap. They wanted Bombardier to fix the Legacy problems too, with the Bomber money. Again what thieves. That's why they got $1B off the price before they firmed up the deal. What else did they want? They withheld the $400M, and Bombardier closed in dispute. WHY? Because without that closing $7.5B (?) on closing the Bomber would have gone under. So the Bomber closed the deal. But Bombardier didn't forget that money that Alstom withheld, so Bombardier told Alstom that they are going after the closing funds that were withheld. So what does Alstom do? They go on the ATTACK saying that they won't pay or release the $400M for any stupid excuse that they could think of. My only question is is, that. What are the laws for funds in dispute on closing? This happens all the time, where Buyers like Alstom, don't want to pay up at closing. But that money here in Canadian Law is that, for those Funds are being  "HELD IN ESCROW" until the dispute is resolved. I wonder how Europe deals with these situations of dispute. Maybe the same way. For sure the Bomber wanted to get their hands on it, and that's when Alstom started to point fingers, and make up all kinds of excuses to stop the transfer of funds. I hope the Bomber sues the shite out of Alstom. That money is the Bombers. This is why I get so upset with this idiot's PB's dealings. The problem doesn't stop there with PB. Doesn't this company (Family) know how to hire good Lawyers to help them deal with these Billions that they are being Ripped off of  on every deal???? Sorry to ask this. I don't mean to sound prejudiced against the many bright people, and smart businessmen of Quebec. Are all Quebec outfits this naive?? I doubt that the  Paladeau's, Desmarais, Case's, Air Canada's, the Alimentation Couche-Tards and so many other good Quebec outfis are this NAIVE. I hope I'm wrong here, and this "IDIOT HEIR" PB is the only dumb F$*&^%K businessman left in Quebec. Because I really got tired of the stupid business decisions in his REING of the Bomber. Even now I'm regretting that even averaged down. 




MyNameIsNobody wrote: Bago - I once asked you a simple question and you declined to answer.. adding your own smart-*ss reply. The ' I'm suing to even-out some other claim against me ' is a valid argument as far as a negotiation tactic from Alstom... imho

 




<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>