RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Debt clubhouse19 wrote: True that a stock split helps to get more retail on board...but the fact is at this stage of the game, the issue IMO is to get more longer term institutional investors in and until that happens, a split at this stage will not change anything as to the volatility and the manipulation this stock goes through.
I think we are still quite a ways away from that happening as other than the possibility of defense rrevs increasing along with after market service, there is no other at this moment a clear avenue for growth.
I see the after market services as being the real profit maker going forward in the shorter term.
Look at GE this AM, their stock is going up as mentioned by pundits on CNBC, that the real reason is the after sales revenues in the sales of their engines after 4 or 5 years after the sale.
Growth is the name of the game, and certainly the debt is a hinderance to that. That is a dilemna that Eric Martel still faces and hopefully the backlog of orders and the continued demand of their present product offering will buy them enough time to realy consider growth unless a partnership is realized.
Just My opinion on the present situation
I agree that at this point in time there is no need for stock structure change ... the main goals are getting the company running at 100 % and growing the service side ... the main focus is paying down debt with profits is key and proving that they can manage the debt going forward with futur endeavours ... GLTA