Baytex Energy Corp T.BTE

It baffles me that people think Juniper should be married...

[Nextlegup]

to Baytex.

Juniper invested in Ranger, not Baytex, so when Baytex decided to take a run at Ranger why are people so concerned that Juniper might want to redeploy the $700 MILLION US investment and diversify elsewhere?

Just business IMO...

[stock_for_gold]

That was the problem with Juniper. They ended up with almost 20% of a company that they didn't care for or didn't want to invest in. We all knew that they were going to offload their shares sooner or later which isn't the issue. It's the amount of shares that they owned which could affect the value of baytex. Thank goodness WTI is above $90 which helps this stick from dropping a

[robert41]

Why is that an issue it's in the past every investor new what they were dealing with and decided accordingly if they wanted to invest. I think its impressive a buyer picked up 51 million shares. I wish it was baytex being able to afford it to reduce the float.

[stock_for_gold]

I would love to know who the invested was that bought 51 million shares since they mentioned arms length

[stock_for_gold]

Even though I believed that this was an issue I still believed that Baytex was worth the risk. I even sold some Ath, POU and Tou to add to my position.Im long on this stock 

[robert41]

There's no reason not to believe unless the cycle is over 51 million shares just moved to hands that must believe the cycle is in tact and energy stocks will go higher. No?

[FreddieSanford]

Look at the chart and look where the block trade was priced and executed ... and all of todays volume "Ranged" out at ... it's a good look. [img]https://www.stockwatch.com/Chart/Hist?symbol=BTE®ion=C[/img]

[David01montreal]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy