RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Tax Reform!!! Wow, my facts are wrong and I am a victim of "the media bias against Trump" because I'm smart enough not to believe everything CNN says?
The polls were not wrong, CNN was. The polling showed Clinton winning the popular vote by 4 points on average, and she won by over 2 points on election night. That's well within the margin of error. Which means the polls got it right. Now they didn't get every state right, but again you're forgetting the margin of error and sample sizes. Polling at the state level had higher margins of error. So yes, they didn't predict perfectly, but no one in their right mind expects polls to be right 100% of the time. Trump had a 25% chance of winning more or less according to polls. CNN was wrong to predict Clinton's win as surefire. That's not the polls' fault. And just because polls didn't get it quite right doesn't mean they have no value at all. Why do you think both Democrats and Republicans continue to conduct internal polling?
lashout wrote: If you would go by the popular vote that Clinton won by the US would be ruled by 2 states. Newyork and California.....that is not the way it works....all states have to be represented......I watched CNN the night of the election and the polls were wrong.......they were positive that by the polls that There was no way that Trump was going to win the Electoroal votes to become President.....so your facts are wrong and shows that you are victim of the media bias against Trump. So did they just poll California and Newyork because then you are right Clinton should of won. So I was right they polled where Clinton was I favour. Which is why they lost. Look I don't care who is president I just care about oil going up.