Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Cardinal Energy Ltd (Alberta) T.CJ

Alternate Symbol(s):  CRLFF

Cardinal Energy Ltd. is an oil and gas company with operations focused on low decline oil in Western Canada. It is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and production of petroleum and natural gas in the provinces of Alberta, British Columbia, and Saskatchewan. Its operating areas include the Midale, South District, Central District, and North District. It has over 730 million original oils in place (OOIP) and its low decline production of approximately 3,200 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boe/d) is supported by both water and carbon dioxide (CO2) enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Its South District operating area is located east of Calgary in southeastern Alberta and produces medium gravity crude, as well as liquids-rich natural gas. Its Central District operation is located in East Central Alberta, which is focused on producing oil from multiple, large original oil in place (OOIP) pools. Its North area includes Grande Prairie, Clearwater, House Mountain, Mica, and Mitsue properties.


TSX:CJ - Post by User

Comment by JayBankson Jul 17, 2022 3:14pm
156 Views
Post# 34829958

RE:RE:RE:Share buy backs

RE:RE:RE:Share buy backsI'm not extreamly against share buybacks, but I do have a couple concerns on them despite the positives...

Positives being:
- shares have more potential value in that it increases your percentage of holding
- less shares means the dividend is more sustainable in terms of cost to payout, also means payout can be increased to match the buyback percentage (ie if by the current maths .10/month was sustainable, than with a 10% reduction in shares .11/month becomes appropriate with no added FCF needed)

My concerns:
- those paid to purchase the shares to be retired were not long term holders, therefore your paying out to uncommitted investors (they talk about buybacks as a return to shareholders, I believe it's a return to the wrong shareholders, more like traders or weak hands)
- as much as our personal percentage of ownership increases, as does the larger holders
- the larger holders (in this case I believe I'm pointing at Edwards) are very unlikely reducing thier positions for the retirement of shares, therefore there are less shares out there for the retailers like you and me
- should we have an oil downturn for whatever reason and the companies shares stay undervalued (as I believe most on this board agree they seem) or even go lower, the cost to take private or be taken over by anouther company becomes reduced (increasing the possibility) and it's less likely the current shareholders achieve the value we feel we are holding

This doesn't change my opinion on being a holder here, but I believe it increases my risks of not holding in the future by little choice of my own. I also feel that buyback $$$ would have been better suited to be spread to long term holders rather than those getting out. But more my concern I think it would have been more prudent to buyback before the payouts started as I just see that as money flushed out of my ownership that will hopefully be balanced by future returns.

I hope my concerns are just my mind wandering on the issue and looking for possible problems as I wish to be holding this name deep into the foreseeable future while collecting a significant payout each month. Share buybacks are not my favorite thing, especially on a significant cash generator and rather lower sized company even tho I know the positives of them.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>