Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

CANEXUS CORP 6.5 PCT DEBS T.CUS.DB.D



TSX:CUS.DB.D - Post by User

Comment by Calgaryrideron Jun 12, 2015 11:28am
164 Views
Post# 23824409

RE:RE:RE:RE:Seeking Alpha Article - Canexus

RE:RE:RE:RE:Seeking Alpha Article - CanexusI just want to point out that you can be within bank convenants (because they only calculate debt based on secured, bank debt - not convertible debs), but as a consequence still be at the risk of dilution BECAUSE of the debs.   And they can meet convenants now, but can they meet them at higher interest rates?  1% higher?  2% higher?  We know they have a lot of US denominated debt.  It's not implausible that US interest rates are higher next year.  Can they survive?  If there's risk, expect the banks to have a say as to what they do with that $75M.

With what's going on in the oil patch, where several banks are tremendously exposed, all the banks are riding their clients on much shorter leashes. 

With the performance of this management team, both on NATO and recently in chemicals too, I'd have them on a short leash. 

They didn't just screw up the project, which was inexusable in and of itself.  They screwed up things commercily that constrained the value of the asset (incl. take or pay contracts that were absurd).  Theys screwed up on timing and scheduling (risk managment).  They screwed up communication to the public about those contracts and both expected and actual performance ["Hey, we're loading 5.5. trains, they just happen to be short ones!, is that relevant?"] 
The track record of these clowns is - in a word - poor.

If you're truly convinced this is a double or triple from here, you should be buying more.....but what I hear is that your investment thesis has turned to 'hope'.....yes, a four-letter word.  I just don't subscribe to that approach.  There are better places to make more money sooner and more reliably.



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>