RE:RE:Can we please....Kherson wrote: ocean112 wrote: put Kherson, Calgaryrider, and Slewfoot on ignore.....these guys are playing us for fools everytime we respond to them. I'd like to think I'm providing some insight on this board - and welcome insight from others - but if Kherson and co continue to monopolize the board by baiting us to respond - i'm out.
Please - let's all agree to put Kherson, Calgary rider, and Slewfoot - Kherson's various aliases - on ignore so we can reclaim this board.
Ocean112, you ask folks to put Calgaryrider on ignore back in February, now you are asking for his advice? The only insight that you are providing is that you are indeed a nut!
Again, too funny!
Kherson
Calgaryrider gives his honest opinion of Canexus and now Ocean112 attacks him for it. Very odd...
What is also odd with the continuing Canexus saga is that the person who initiated the Blunderheim disaster seems to be still employed by Canexus as the Senior Director, Shareholder Relations! No wonder the information in the Material Change Report concerning Rich's retirement was not accurate!
On a different note, I finished reading over the Blunderheim Asset Sale and Purchase Agreement listed on SEDAR just yesterday. It looks like MEG is not the only one in litigation with Canexus concerning Blunderheim.
But what is very troubling is the lack of complete information, concerning this agreement. Some of the schedules that were attached to the Agreement are missing!
In the agreement's own words, " The schedules...... are hereby incorporated into and form an integral part of this Agreement for all purposes of it".
It sure seems that someone has something to hide, yet again!
Kherson