RE:RE:Shorts Out Of LineThere you go again with your lies Lattice. These are the kind of posts I'm talking about.
The EBITDA I used was the post Brexit Q2 estimate from TD. For the record, the estimate is reasonable. Q1 was 141M (that was very impressive when you consider they lost about 6 or 7M on forex) and I see no reason why they can't make 147M in Q2. Nothing is ever guaranteed, we can only work on what is probable. I don't read all your posts (who does?) but from what I have read I find your short thesis weak. Your facts are as scarce as hens teeth. Your scenarios seem unprobable and/or would be of low impact on ability to reduce debt to EBITDA going forward.
As far as "ADJUSTED" EBITDA goes, why would you not use adjusted EBITDA? Adjusted EBITDA is perfectly acceptable and is in fact more accurate. In VRX's case the CFO was doing improper things that were not considered acceptable accounting practices. That has nothing to do with any other company.
If you think my numbers are fictitious then it's probable that you in for a nasty surprise.
LatticeInExile wrote: wallop13 wrote: Shorts work this board to death. It's honestly out of control. They make slanderous accusations and package them up as the truth. It really doesn't take much to scare people, there's no need to post 10 times a day and then 5 star every smear you post. I, for one, hope you don't get a shot across the bow if this thing sells. GLTAL
.... says the day trader who has been flaunting fictitious EBITDA on this board since he traded into this stock. Even in the best of times, no one falls for that anymore. And I, for one, hope all companies that use ADJUSTED metrics get FUCCCKED.