RE:Well, here they all are....Exactly echoing my thoughts in a previous post in which I said:
To me the strategic review was simply about the management guarding themselves against questions. They didn't need shareholder approval to get it going and now it's been months and by this very act, they freed themselves of answering to angry and worried shareholders under the legal pretext that they can't talk about that stuff while it's ongoing. It's been ongoing for ever and considering the resources of the players ''supposedly'' at the table, it should have taken a few weeks no more. Don't you think it's abnormal for such a small company ? I mean come on. And yes, ''Hope for the best, but plan for the worst'' as in hedge.
select1011 wrote: ....all the longs, stroking themselves each other and their losses. I have watched you all from $60 down to $18, over analyse the pre-opening bid/asks, the first few minutes of trading, half thought out technicals, the earnings miss in Q1, Brexit, and even the strategic review. The review, in my view, is just a legal manoeuver for not having to report much about anything during Q2. We heard nothing of substance from the company since Q1. In any case, you all have such great faith in your investments and losses and I have to say I would love you in my religion...but I think I will have to wait until Friday morning, when there will be white smoke over St Peter's and it will be time for you to change. We'll do the Frampton test then, "Do you, you, feel like I do?" Meantime longs, hope for the best, but plan for the worst.