RE:RE:To all longs: Why did the CEO transfer over 2M shares? Dumberfeverlong, you're not a crook too are you? Crooks hate having information discussed. The want to keep in all under the carpet. Well, that's not working out too well is it? " Stop spreading ... information." Nope, ain't going to happen. Information will be posted as I dig it up.
What date was the proxy circular filed and since it's no longer in Canada, how can we tell he still owns the company especially now that the company confirmed, late August, that shares in that company were given as collateral as a loan.
Doesn't the lender of the money own the shares now? Didn't they did the cash to MT on that deal?
Are you stupid or just playing it?
Lumberfeverlong wrote: It was diclosed in the proxy circular and it is his 100% owned company. Done for tax planning reasons and no different than him owning the shares personally from a control perspective. If the company sells to a third party, it would have to be disclosed. Stop spreading irrelevant information.
PROtrading wrote:
When you change ownership from yourself to a different entity, a numbered, nameless, corporation, why was this not disclosed? How can longs defend that action?
As of that moment, the CEO no longer owns those shares. They are controlled by the company that can be transferred, assigned etc to another shareholder.