RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:The fake bid/ask manipulation is only eclipsed by ..Yes, I either made a mistake or added in the fee for Goldman's commission and Greenhills charges for the months of work they did to come up with this wonderful strategic solution, I then took all they expenses, classed them as assets and ammortized them for a period of five and a half years so they wouldn't look like expenses for this year. I get around $39 mil expensed for the peiod of the duration of the bonds.
capmorgan wrote: Craibad, back to school you go. $350M X 9% = $31.5 M in interest not $39M as you stated.
Come on guys let's stop lying here.
Craigbad wrote: I'm just using simple math...more debt, $39 million more in interest, given the leverage its a fast sliding scale. What are you usin.."hope"? I find math more reliable.
Juice004 wrote: Yes it was. You really think this notes offering changes everyone's PT to the downside? We shall see bud.