Concordia Healthcare Corp. T.CXR.R

Nasdaq 9 analyst said nothing about CXR

[healthstock1234]

https://www.financialmagazin.com/after-todays-huge-increase-is-concordia-healthcare-corps-near-term-analysis-positive-2/

<Out of 9 analysts covering Concordia Healthcare Corp. (NASDAQ:CXRX), 0 rate it “Buy”, 0 “Sell”, while 0 “Hold”. This means NaN are positive. >

In my opinion NaN are positive or NEGATIVE.They had nothing to say about CXR.

I never saw before it 9 analysts without opinion.

[Marcel7]

Not sure what this is about but this is not news. Or anything really. These articles are automatically generated. Simply a software error. By definition if an analyis is covering the stock they have an option. That is what is meant by coverage. "NaN" is simply means that there is an error. Just google financialmagazin and NaN and you will find plenty of examples, such as this one: 

[healthstock1234]

Thank you for your prompt answer.It seems to be the true answer.

[adamchess]

healthstoch1234: These are the opinions shown on same page I see every time. Not sure what is your problem. best regards 03/12/2015 Broker: Mackie Rating: Hold Downgrade 22/10/2015 Broker: TD Securities Rating: Buy Old Target: $105.00 New Target: $60.00 Target Down 30/09/2015 Broker: TD Securities Rating: Buy Old Target: $135.00 New Target: $105.00 Target Down 28/09/2015 Broker: RBC Capital

[healthstock1234]

[ There were a problem with this article some hours ago. They said 9 analysts but zero buy , zero hold and zero sell....Maybe they have changed this article. Thanks quote=adamchess]healthstoch1234: These are the opinions shown on same page I see every time. Not sure what is your problem. best regards 03/12/2015 Broker: Mackie Rating: Hold Downgrade 22/10/2015 Broker: TD Securities Rating: Buy

[Bullphighter]

I call these guys "noise" Seriously, I believe the debt will be paid, from earnings. My opinion is the only one that counts. Common sense guys, I bought in for a reason. I believe )) [/quote]

[healthstock1234]

after reading consolidated financial statements  and all about CXR I remain at my $100 target next year. [/quote]

[adamchess]

I am not sure your opinion counts unless you back it up with buys, but most of the analysts are giving a target over $100 or more. The others are notvvrong and have no friends. Cheers [/quote]

[healthstock1234]

If for you to have friends means to write target more than $100, I am not this person. For me, be a friend means to advice your friend. My opinion was $100 target and $140 high. TSX has change the target from $94 to$77!Mackie said...and others....in the last month. I said that I maintain my target, because nothing is changed on fundamentals despite the target (lower) that many analysts wrote in

[Slinger14]

Here we go talking about notwrong again.  After several peaceful days, I guess it was due.  I agree with the first part of your post about not changing your target on CXR since nothing has changed.  I very strongly disagree with the second part, however.  If you read notwrong's posts, you would see that he, in fact, is the bully.  He has violated virtually every rule

[healthstock1234]

What I want to say is only that you can choose another way to fight it, a  simple way  without having inappropriate actions. I started to read and answer only the posts that I believed that have a real link with CXR.If ,by accident, I am reading something else, I skip the post, nothing else.I applied it for notwrong and I had sunny days when him posted on stockhouse

[adamchess]

healthstock: that article has been saying the same thing every time I have looked at for quite a while - not just hours ago.