Concordia Healthcare Corp. T.CXR.R

RE:RE:Nasdaq 9 analyst said nothing about CXR

[healthstock1234]

Thank you for your prompt answer.It seems to be the true answer.

Marcel7 wrote: Not sure what this is about but this is not news. Or anything really.

These articles are automatically generated. Simply a software error. By definition if an analyis is covering the stock they have an option. That is what is meant by coverage.

"NaN" is simply means that there is an error. Just google financialmagazin and NaN and you will find plenty of examples, such as this one: 
https://www.financialmagazin.com/whats-propelling-aac-holdings-inc-to-decline-so-much/

I don't think financialmagazin.com auto generated articles should be your main source of analyst options.

Marcel

healthstock1234 wrote: https://www.financialmagazin.com/after-todays-huge-increase-is-concordia-healthcare-corps-near-term-analysis-positive-2/

<Out of 9 analysts covering Concordia Healthcare Corp. (NASDAQ:CXRX), 0 rate it “Buy”, 0 “Sell”, while 0 “Hold”. This means NaN are positive. >

In my opinion NaN are positive or NEGATIVE.They had nothing to say about CXR.

I never saw before it 9 analysts without opinion.