Comment by
IatticeInExiIe on Jul 30, 2016 2:02am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
Marwood on Jul 30, 2016 2:16am
Sorry I posted; timing you know... I think you covered it Lattice.
Comment by
notwrong on Jul 30, 2016 11:20am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
pineapple1 on Jul 30, 2016 11:51am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
IatticeInExiIe on Jul 30, 2016 11:52am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
IatticeInExiIe on Jul 30, 2016 11:55am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
Marwood on Jul 30, 2016 4:22pm
No need to post more; I'm sure anyone looking into the drug has read these long ago. Controlled studies, and sample sizes are what matters.
Comment by
notwrong on Jul 30, 2016 5:08pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
Marwood on Jul 30, 2016 2:13am
Anecdotal evidence is enough to convince you of a drug's efficacy, in this day and age? We do have better processes, such as double blind studies. Don't rely on others personal experiences/opinions either in picking medications or stocks. Processes for collecting reliable data improve over time; take advantage of that. Don't be lazy.
Comment by
notwrong on Jul 30, 2016 10:53am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
notwrong on Jul 30, 2016 11:02am
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
IatticeInExiIe on Jul 30, 2016 2:56pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
GoldBug024 on Jul 30, 2016 3:38pm
Both of you are heartless human beings. I am okay financially, I don't depend on any stock. But you guys would rather have a drug taken off the market to negatively impact a company rather than allow sick people to feel better. Why would you make fun of and laugh at people with health conditions? quote=IatticeInExiIe] LMFA! [/quote]
Comment by
sunshine7 on Jul 30, 2016 3:46pm
"Why would you make fun of and laugh at people with health conditions?" ... Because that's who they are.
Comment by
IatticeInExiIe on Jul 30, 2016 3:52pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
adamchess on Jul 30, 2016 4:14pm
Why is Concordia being asked about the efficiency of Donnatel when this product has existed for ages? Surely, it has been found to significantly benefit customers or it would have been tossed out years ago. The whole attack by shorts makes no sense. Sales force was increased recently to boost sales of this product.
Comment by
adamchess on Jul 30, 2016 4:17pm
sorry, meant to say effectiveness or efficacy not efficiency?
Comment by
Marwood on Jul 30, 2016 5:27pm
You are very kind, sharing your insights with a board that has, recently, been a little unkind to you.
Comment by
puma1 on Jul 30, 2016 6:06pm
Good context and reminder that this company is pushing out about $CDN 7 bucks a year adj EPS with the GBP dropping another 10% factored in. Straight from RBC.
Comment by
LatticeInExiIe on Jul 30, 2016 4:38pm
This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy
Comment by
BuyingNow on Jul 30, 2016 5:11pm
The letters from the fda to cancodia on this fda regulations site could have easily been fabricated. Also the letter from Cancordias lawyer. I don't believe that this drug is not fda approved fully and I don't believe that the fda requested this if they did I'm sure that the ceo would have handled it properly. It is only one drug out of hundreds anyways.