RE:RE:RE:RE:Does anybody do any math?GeorgeBasset wrote: hyac wrote: I red that they were splitting the premium (8$) between the exhibitor, the producer and them. I'm guessing that it would be equal, so 2,66$ by seat.
It's almost guaranteed to be way loewer, but they don't publish much for competitive reasons, although if they gain a significant increase in seat count, they will get some pricing power over their cinema partners. And silentreader, where did you see that a contract like NFL or some theme park contract brings them recurring revenues. When a consummer experience isn't branded as d-box or powered by d-box, It would be very, very surprising that they get any of the admission cost.
It is lower than 2,66$ - I know from a very relaible source.
You can't look at it from a seat perspective, you have to look at the average revenue a screen generates. It is oviously decreasing since the average number of seats per screens is decreasing because of the high demand for the luxury recliners, which are deployed in smaller numbers per room, and also becuase theatres now buy the seats instead of D-Box financing them.
Everytime they install a new screen, you can estimate that it will generate 10 000$ to 13 000$ of recurring revenue per year depending on box office results.
As for the recurring revenue from the them market like NFL or VR games, once again I know from a very reliable source.