cad613 You asked a couple of days ago why Securities Authorities have not come down on dynaCERT and also commented that KarbonKleen "Seems Fishy".
Yes, both of those are valid comments and neither is easily answered.
I suspect OSC etc. watch the company reasonably closely due to the years of failure to deliver on any of the their statements but in the end they seem to be staying just inside the lines with their disclosure and disclaimer statements.
Moreover, they have dutifully attended to filing requirements for the most part, though there have been delays from time to time.
As for KarbonKleen, it also appears to be a case of just barely, but successfully, creating legal separation betwwen the principals, though I have nnever been convined that KarbonLeen isnt simply a vehicle to essentially "launder, re-funnel, divert" money raised through shareholders/investors back to DYA principals.
About 2 1/2 years ago the CSE/OSC issued a staff notice.
( https://www.bcsc.bc.ca/-/media/PWS/Resources/Securities_Law/Policies/Policy5/51356-CSA-Staff-Notice-November-29-2018.pdf )
that on the surface at least , addresses the issue of Misleading News Releases.
At the time, a group of shareholders contacted J.P Colin, J.Payne etc and it lead to a brief period of reasonably good communication that included a Question/Answer session with J.P. Colin.
Following that however, conditions and communications returned to "Normal".
Some shareholders, including myself, worked our way out of our holdings and to the best of my knowledge there has not been a subsequent organized shareholder effort to force integrity, answers or accountability from the company.
Accordingly, they are able to remain listed, unaccountable and quite capable of coming up with new "Hooks and Stories".
Because it always appears they are at the "Edge of Stardom and the product seems to have merit" new investors continue to be drawn in.