Alternative Set of FactsUndoubtably this bullboard is one of the more disfunctional ones on Stockhouse.
Why is that?
Clearly, one poster "Dante et al" has reason to believe he and all other shareholders has been mislead, lied to etc. by a variety of management representatives , particularly CEO Payne, over the years.
Because of this he feels compelled to repeat some of the major or at least more obvious facts . Perhaps this is purely a release for anger. Who knows?
As for "The Letter??" i.e.when it was written?, if it was written?, who wrote it?,what it contains? etc.
What does it matter?
If it is out there and if it has been provided to the OSC/SEC then it is presumably being investigated, though I don't happen to hold much faith in Canadian Security commission investigation and enforcement mechanisms.
More interesting to me is:
Why are posters here focusing upon deriding the negative facts/opinions presented by some, such as Dante, rather than presenting "Alternative, Verifiable, Positive information?
Everyone can "Hope" for better days but it does seem that for more a a dozen years the announcements from the company have consistently fallen flat at best or turned out to be fabrications at worst while millions in shareholder/investor funds are eaten up every year.
.
If the foregoing is not the case, then logically present current, supportable scenarios and facts to offset the verfiable (letter?? excluded) negative information with which most are too familiar.
Surely that would be more productive.