RE:RE:RE:Thank goodness...MM, everytime you equate some Moniker with me, I will post your duplicity:
MM,
You and your other aliases have a complex. Just because you have been caught red handed, doesn't mean everyone else does the same thing. The only reason you put Inca and I in the same boat is that we question you (and your cohorts) conspiracy theories. I don't know him from Adam but do know he has legitimate concerns/questions/points. That does not make him a Beech boy, a naysayer or in cahoots to bring the price down or following the company's line of not projecting until verified.
Oh, you want proof:
MM's faux pas (which includes so many good questions, by the way):
January 22, 2018 - 03:43 PM 225 Reads
Post# 27410792
Read it at:
https://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/t.edt/spectral-medical-inc?postid=27410792#POsmJpM6WkJ6uT0O.99
This includes your remark, as MM, and I quote:
"Why is the market (based on current SP) thinking that the odds of success are in the range of 7% ( see MM’s math post) yet insiders are standing pat with their positions? Do they see the odds of success as being the complete reverse? What would it take for the market to have a more enlightened/optimistic view ?"
My proof is:
Why, as you write as MM, do you say: "see MM's math post" instead of "my math post".
You were totally confused as to who you were writing as. Left hand didn't know to switch to right hand!
But keep accusing others of being like you when their points don't match yours - nobody here is being the company lackies.
YOU and STT, IG and others too, imo, (previous monikers include, SWYG, George the loser, Schemehatcher, Squarewheel) are too full of yourself.
Stick to points about the company and not others. You've proven yourself to be two faced.