RE:RE:Why was VP Foster "completely passed over" during recent ...MY thinking was along the lines of "real-time data knowledge" and potentially more advanced relations with Baxter.."spectralation of coarse" ..
Furthermore, I found it unUSUAL ( purposeful text choice ) thayt in the recent NR, "
Baxter", that is "
Baxter" was referred to as our PMX distribution partner...funny, maybe their name was an "over-cyte" ala "Altercyte"...
Keep putting the screws to people...the "dirtier it gets, the more succesful it looks" - just my humble, yet farely educate opinion" ...I challenge any person outside the inner circle to provide more notes, recordings and general knowledge than I have in regards to good ole "DIAGF"..I mean "EDTXF"
PLEASE know...an ERROR was made here.."EXISTING PARTNER"..not "Exiting" BIg difference.. Why was VP Foster "completely passed over" during recent ...
record reward "handouts" ...
Know too, that the 3M PSUs ( performance share units ) delivered to both Kellum and the former pot executive ( sadly, now a DE_LISTED "pot play" ) are ONLY of value IF, they achieve FDA apporoval on exisitng endeavors to compliment the existing 4 FDA approvals already in the #12 horse's stable ( #12 horse was a pure Albertan concept ):
A close friend and rather "astute" business mind wondered if Foster was in a uniuque position whereby she was unable to accept the "delicious dole-out" as a result of unique trial knowledge or perhaps an arrangement with an "exiting partner" that prevented her from benefitting. I would like to see other more "lucky" participants share with VP Foster...SHE is the most hands-on figure in the PMX / EAA / SAMI theranostic endeavor..IMHEO of course! Birch Hill Private equity and Toray seem "content" .....
I wonder why VP Foster was "passed over" on the RSU / option loot-bag program?
A deer friend ( and that is no white tale ) suggested that if ( IF ) Spectral and it's "handful of FDA approvals" were "gulped" ....that potentially her rewards would come as she is sooo very important to Spectral, especially as the PMX / EAA / SAMI theranostic program is concerned.
I had to agree as I can't imagine why "she" would be passed over when she has served since 2001 and essentially been the lead on the clinical program for PMX ( boots on the ground if you will )
Then again, why would someone say from a 1 penny+ CAD, thriving pot play, be in a position to own say 10 times what she has after about 2 or 3 years of "flailing" ..even if directed as per corporate strategy?
The above question from my "deer friend" ...my response...
We can't be giving irrational and deluxe type rewards to a person with a direct conduit to important people without setting a Canadien presidence...FURTHERMORE ...if "at the end of the day" ( I love that dopey expression ) pen gets "put to papier", we can always leverage hard on the concept of doctors being wonderful scientists but poor purveyors of "business acumen"....whilst they can only accumulate large quantities of "worthless rewards" ..albeit "temporary on the "pricing adjective"
Use a $poon there is much to comsume there fellas ;