RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:i-Dialco
I'll hold you to continuing to call out BSW and St
Rather than pumping, I think a more fair characterization of my posts is that 80% + are factual in nature.
Another maybe 9% are "glass half full" posts. More often than not, in response to the outlandish bashing posts... or to fill the void of information, using common sense to fill in the blanks.
Back to your main issue.
I also think a good number of my posts ( over many years) have lamented the fact that we ( retail SHers) are all working with VERY limited data ( see puzzle - in a dimly lit room - all while subject to gaslighting courtesy of a handful ( one?) (assigned?) of SH member(s).
Two comments:
Only a lawyer knows the legal requirements, particularly given ongoing or incomplete negotiations, with NDAs ( likely) in effect, and under the " not so watchful" eye of the OSC.
Will they change the path followed for the past two decades? Unlikely in my estimation.... UNTIL the very last minute.
Now ask yourself who benefits from such a setup ? And how?
Then ask who benefits from SH bashing ?
Maybe we'd all feel better at $0.65 or $1.20, or $1.90 but that does not seem to be the game plan... as we progress through the endgame stages.
A chess game may not look so lop-sided until the two pawns on the other side of the the board are queened. It requires investors to decide if the pawns are likely to make it to the destination unopposed, in the face of distractions on the opposite side of the board.
Nevertheless, I truly hope that you get the information you seek.
MM
PS IMO the EMH does and does not apply to Spectral
It does in the sense that the SP reflects all KNOWN information.
It does not in the sense it's very difficult, if not impossible, to piece together all the KNOWN information particularly in a gaslit room.