RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Keystone xlIt's not common sense for these people. Whether it's a new pipeline, or a replacement to an adjacent pipeline, it is a new pipeline in both scenarios. The activists don't care, they want them all decommissioned, especially if they have reached the end of their lifespan. They want to replace aging pipelines with clean energy, not new pipeline. They've already stated this several times. You're suggesting that you can build again because of some grandfathering system does not compute to these harpies.
autofocus111 wrote: fiddy "why stop at Keystone"? Because KXL is a line that adds a large step increase of new shipping capacity. Biden is hard-pressed not to at least try to stop it to appease the environmentalists who supported him. ENB L3/5 projects are merely replacements to existing lines. It's a difference of night and day. Biden wants to send a clear message that he is on their side, not entirely decimate the NA fossil energy industry in one fell swoop. He and at least some minority of democrats in congress are not anywhere close to that extreme. Use a bit of common sense sheesh.