Post by
tamaracktop on Feb 17, 2024 2:00am
Both curious and very disappointing
There's been no reported trades.
You'd think if she bought any size she'd have filed right away.
Anything less than at least 2 or 3 hundred would be disappointing.
That's about it.
Anything more would definitely have a "marked" effect
Comment by
DRSeus on Feb 17, 2024 2:06am
That would be hilarious actually less than 10k shocking actually
Comment by
tamaracktop on Feb 17, 2024 2:11am
What was that intended to mean?
Comment by
DRSeus on Feb 17, 2024 10:39am
it seems quite clear if Sue took 300 shares it would be hilarious as in patheticly funny IMO if she took less than 10k shares it is FLUFF means nothing as a CEO she needs to commit some of her money which is really share holders money anyway as we pay her salary
Comment by
DRSeus on Feb 17, 2024 11:20am
actually the fact you think over 300 would be something is ridiculous
Comment by
tamaracktop on Feb 17, 2024 1:26pm
I was referring to 2 or 3 hundred thousand, not 2 or 3 hundred shares. lol
Comment by
TeamEddie on Feb 17, 2024 3:22pm
Lol lol lol ha ha ha omg yes so u wrote 2 or 300 to indicate 200k I am certain she did not
Comment by
jboom70 on Feb 17, 2024 3:24pm
Why would any of the new and remaining management buy shares? With the newly formed Sexro they will draw up a another grant package and get them all for free or at a discount. So on top of their high rate of pay they will say they need grants to attract top employee's, then not hire anyone. LOL gotta love public companies spending shareholder's money.