Post by
tamaracktop on Mar 29, 2024 9:06pm
Why is everyone talking about a reverse split?
More liquidity is fine.
A prerequisite for institutional participation.
Nasdaq listing?
Too expensive, and premature to be talking about it
Comment by
TeamEddie on Mar 29, 2024 9:20pm
BS you clearly own shares please explain how more shares will get them on the NASDAQ it wont the only way they get there is a reverse split Institutional participation you are just typing words for attention clearly as INSTITUTIONS do not invest in spec plays with next to no business
Comment by
tamaracktop on Mar 29, 2024 10:25pm
BS BS and more BS. FYI. Institutions already own this. I didn't say more shares will get them on the Nasdaq, please point out where I even suggested it. Good luck. I didn't. I said at this point in the company's evolution, the Nasdaq and associated reporting requirements are too costly, and the Nasdaq is over-hyped.
Comment by
sorrenson on Mar 29, 2024 10:44pm
I believe Sue or Derwood actually stated reverse split then Nasdaq in one of their recent spewing sessions.. I not going to go thru the videos and look as I can only stomach so much BS .
Comment by
TeamEddie on Mar 30, 2024 12:00am
TT read what you wrote not what you thought when you wrote it, it has become clear you have a mental state that is not based in reality Please read your post above and let us know how what your reply says you wrote and what you actually wrote are correlated clearly your mental state is not good
Comment by
tamaracktop on Mar 29, 2024 10:27pm
Let's try that again. "please explain how more shares will get them on the NASDAQ it wont the only way they get there is a reverse split".. What the f### are you talking about?
Comment by
TeamEddie on Mar 30, 2024 12:08am
DUDE!!!! Write the actual thoughts you have out and people may understand you writing things that are not correlated to what you claim to be saying is a sign of insanity