G5Incorporated wrote: Mr. / Ms. quakes99 :
For ease and clarity I am replying in this fashion, as opposed to replying to each of your (specific) posts to me from yesterday. I acknowledge your time / effort / detail regarding same. You have not been ignored.
You are in the YES Camp, and apparently the Point-Man for the Yes Camp. I am in the NO Camp. Given this polarity we could waste a lot of time; our time, and the time of many others here, engaged in what could become a protracted bickering sorts. I'm not a fan of that type of "communication" as it were. Given this, I have chosen not to reply line-by-line, post-by-post.
Given your prominence on this board; 4,000 posts and 1,000,000+ reads since April 2013 is surely impressive, and the serious nature of all things being contemplated here, I think it's time for you to shed the cloak of anonymity.
I suggest it's time for you to make your real name, address, occupation, and FCU shareholdings public; this to burnish your very own veracity. Additionally; and given some of what I have read here since July, I think it would be helpful for you to clear the air; in no uncertain terms, and make it known that you either are, or you are not, being compensated (in any manner) to carry the tune for FCU Management. For the record, I have no opinion one way or the other at this point - some on this Board do.
If you can do that - come out as it were - you and I can have many, many, mature, intelligent, in-depth conversations. There may be others that would feel the same way. I'll even give you my phone number so you can call me whenever you like.
There's a lot at stake here. Let's ALL start moving the conversation in a meaningful, valuable, direction. Everybody : Read the Managament Information Circular. At this point in the proceedings it should almost be the defacto criteria for being part of the discsussion.