RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Micromanagement by shareholders? Will it help?... the majority of shareholders were against - allegedly the majority of shares were for but i doubt this (show me the numbers as we all know how Dev is with facts). If the majority of shares were invoved I think the institutions threw managememnt a bone to help try to save their jobs in this non event of a vote (the matter was already setlled before institutions voted). The role of kingsdale was also likely to get enough yes votes to lessen the blow to management's credibility.
Gigi - you are one of handful of management fluffers - your beloved Dev will be gone soon my friend - either by his own volition or being dragged out by security. This is no laughing matter anymore
Gigantapithic wrote: Hardly representative of the average. The majority voted for the merger. Within the minority that didn't vote for the merger there's a lot of shareholders supportive of management. Which means you're not even close to the average. You're more like a negative spammer.
MissingA9 wrote: My posts are a manifestation of the average shareholder's feelings which were created by management's repeated fails. Who is the problem here - concerned shareholders or management? Sweeping this under the rug is not going to solve anything, Potential investors know what the elephant in the room is - a maniac is at the helm of this ship. No one is disputing the asset - it is would class - but bad management can screw up even the best companies - and we will likely be the next example of this "investing rule' if things don't change soonish.
large and concerned FCU shareholder
moneysworth wrote: Missing... I for one certainly do not agree with everything Dev has done! However, your continous stream of NEGATIVE posts day after day, is very much a reason why SOON, "no one will want to own this stock!" Honestly, if I was a potential investor reading ALL your posts I'd avoid this one like the plague!!! If you want to continue, your just shooting yourself in the foot, and being absolutely NO benefit to current shareholders! Unless, (wait a minute?) you current don't own ANY shares? That would make sense why posters might continue to say negative, even after the positive vote to keep Fission a pure play. If you totally ignore the POSITIVE aspects of this play than what good are you, really???