Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Fission Uranium Corp T.FCU

Alternate Symbol(s):  FCUUF

Fission Uranium Corp. is a Canada-based resource company. The Company’s principal business activity is the acquisition and development of exploration and evaluation assets. The Company is a resource issuer specializing in uranium exploration and development in Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin in Western Canada. The Company’s primary asset is the Patterson Lake South (PLS) project, which hosts the Triple R deposit, high-grade and near-surface uranium deposit that occurs within 3.18 kilometers (km) mineralized trend along the Patterson Lake Conductive Corridor. The property comprises approximately 17 contiguous claims totaling approximately 31,039 hectares and is located geographically in the south-west margin of Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin, notable for hosting the highest-grade uranium deposits and operating mines in the world. The Company also has the West Cluff property comprising three claims totaling 11,148-hectares in the western Athabasca Basin region of northern Saskatchewan.


TSX:FCU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by LRGreturns4meon Dec 15, 2015 9:32pm
113 Views
Post# 24386967

RE:RE:NEW Fission Uranium Presentation

RE:RE:NEW Fission Uranium PresentationGentlemen,
Please tell me what the opex will be using the average uranium contract price over the 2012-2014 term which is the average of the peer group actual cost. For a comparison to be valid, there must be a common denominator and since the U price is the assumption for FCU, the assumption should be normalized to the peer group. Can one of you either make this calculation or request that it be published in the spirit of accuracy of the representation?

PLS has a lot of potential and management has stumbled on the PR/Communications side of this project all year. Publishing comparison information that is not "apples to apples" is neither beneficial or valid. I'm looking forward completing the next financing, but I am fearful that management plans to wait until we are in deep need of it due to the SP pressure of late. The sooner they can start drilling the more opportunity to improve the SP before the dilution. We need to hear a plan to address the areas of risk and uncertainty in the much ballyhooed PEA.

The PEA has no cost escalation factor connected with the later stages of the development timeline and no contingency for negative results in the geotechnical analysis, which some have legitimately identified as a valid risk. The same is the true with the outreach and environmental work. If they do not address these issues, all we have is a whole bunch of holes in the ground that have delineated what might could possibly someday become a uranium mine.

I'm good for the rah rah, but I want to rah rah about the reality of where PLS is headed. I like that there is smoke in other areas and if we just want to explore, then lets, use the drill money to poke around some more and leave 780 alone for a while. If we want to advance the whole project, we need to raise a bunch of money, take the dilution and understand that the take out value of an economical project that is that much further advanced is well worth it.  A defined and funded advancement plan is critical to SP improvement. Without it, FCU will be dumped by many by mid spring at the latest. IMO
Bullboard Posts