RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:NEW Fission Uranium PresentationQuakes, Thanks, I get it now, the footnote is actually for all of the FCU values and return calculations in the entire chart, that makes sense. The footnote to the $16.60 opex should actually only reference the FX rate, I guess I just read it wrong.
So the PEA recommends a geotechnical study and advancement of the environmental work and specifically indicates that the environmental work is becoming urgent as to not avoid delays. I guess if management elects to let this piece go behind, it will only push out the timeline for the buyer? Doesn't that impact the value of an acquisition? It seems like there is enough cash to drill this winter only and there are soft costs (geotechnical and environmental work) that are now necessary to advance the project, right? Dont they need to raise funds for drilling, geotechnical and environmental work? I see the path drawn by RPA as far as advancing the project goes, I just wonder how well we will follow that guidance? I know we like to drill.....