Why was the Cat Lake section cut out from the interview?I noticed the recent Crux Investor interview cut out that section about Cat Lake and the issue with the road? I really don't get why they did this (again') because I think that was a good move from Dan to finally address this issue openly in an interview to investors. It's not like there was anything new about it since the issue, as I have been saying earlier, is more or less about Cat Lake wanting to get an all season road to their site and them wanting to have a say in the EA process. I think Dan adressed the issue very well, so this is a bad move on their part to take it out from the interview.
I'm still confident as ever that this will get resolved in the end because the economics of this project are simply massive for the entire region. Everyone will benefit from this. Also, does not seem to be bothering Keith at all since he is still buying every month. But I still don't like it when they cut out those parts about Cat Lake because I think it sends the wrong message to investors.
Of course, there might be some legal issues (non disclosure agreements) about discussing this openly, I don't know, but still this is not a good way to communicate to investors.