RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:FROM BNNIn my opinion, He's still sitting there thinking this is going to the moon with opt. Doesn't even bat a eye at reality and why LPs are in this position, doesn't understand why there's been 4 ceos here or why almost every company across the board has departed their ceos/growing space. Why is there such a surplus and LPs not operating at full capacity? No answer right? Just temporary bad luck right? He's still staring at my comments with a blank look still wondering why his shares are less and less each day, sucker everyday Brent, can't help them all unfortunately, better left to hear pumping all day make him feel better.
brentkostaa wrote: Im curious as to how you dont understand what he's saying. He's actually helping you, though you might be too blind to see that.
MiningGospel wrote: Haha what are you even going on about? No one cares about your thoughtless drivel. Stick to commenting on news articles
watchmeplz wrote: In my opinion, does revenue even matter if it's all done at a loss? What's not relevant? What is unrelevant is you saying it's unrelevant. 40000+ acmpr licensees that created and also own your LP market is definitey relevant and true/real. Opt claims high end here however, there's been several news releases about getting into economy brands like hiway and buying huge trimmers, but we clearly all cleary understand that's not how you produce high end product and even keeping product locked in plastic jars for weeks or months of leadtime is not going to get you a ripe, fresh, juicy off the vine tomatoes, or are you denying that as well like opt has been from $2 down to now?
MiningGospel wrote: Nothing of what you said is relevant. We only care about what the $ amount of revenue is at the next reporting period, and not your half baked conjecture.