Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Supreme Cannabis Company Inc. (The) T.FIRE

The Supreme Cannabis Co Inc is a Canada-based company engaged in the production and sale of medical and recreational cannabis. Its portfolio includes products that address recreational, medical, and wellness consumers. Its brands include BlissCo, Truverra, 7ACRES, Sugarleaf, and Hiway.


TSX:FIRE - Post by User

Comment by Methodon Sep 21, 2020 6:55pm
155 Views
Post# 31595296

RE:lenders to amend the three-year term credit facility

RE:lenders to amend the three-year term credit facility

JiffBeasauce wrote: so i guess this means they are pushing loan payments for 1 year in exchange gor 1.5 % intrerst raise? They say this is positive showing re asurance of the crediter but is it? Or do they see it as there only posibility of getting payed back?  curious on what this says to investers?

 

It's not unexpected given the bank loan was probably central to the debenture negotiation.

The deferral of the covenants gives us some breathing room so FIRE doesn't  breach (accidentally or not) and incur penalties. The 75bp increase in the interest rate is still a rate cut from the beginning of the year since they cut prime by 150bp since March so probably better than budget. 

The cutting of the line could be taken either positively or negatively. Positively, because if you don't need it, don't pay for it. Or negatively, in that the bank doesn't want to extend more credit. Both could also be true. 

That's my take FWIW. 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>