RE: RE: Down 12.5% on 700,000 shares An intelligent person would have inferred from my post that because only 700,000 shares were traded on this news, it shows that shareholders are willing to hold on to their shares and fight this asset sale - because they clearly expect more than 0.11/share, or there would have been higher volume. Logically, the only way that getting over 0.11 can be acheived at this point is if the asset sale was voted down, because voting yes would result in 0.0-0.11/share. So, the low volume is good news.
Next time I'll be more explicit for you airidiot