RE:RE:RE:Paradigm Capital “2022 The Year of VoltaXplore”Part #2 of "A Response to Paradigm Capital's suggestions."
What's more, the very prospect of having it be "a no go" instead of "a go", as pertains to the requisite "consent" which must be attained from existing VoltaXplore and would be NanoXplore partners, share holders, customers etc., represents yet another potentially quite negatively impacting 'risk' to the forward going GRA share price.
Clearly it's yet another clear 'risk' which 'minority' NanoXplore share holders are simply not incentivized to take at this juncture.
To reiterate, what NanoXplore Inc 'principals' need to collectively undertake in order to send the clear message to 'all' share holders, i.e.not just 'insiders' and their respective friends and family', is to quite demonstrably "lock in" a $200M non-dilutive capital raise by way of a much later exerciseable convertible debt offering; and even that has it's eventually dilutive aspect of 'risk' and accompanying 'uncertainty' which I certainly wouldn't appreciate as a common GRA 'minority' class share holder.
NOTE: I would ultimately prefer for NanoXplore 'principals' to 'have already' secured a $200M Quebec provincial government sponsored 'interest free loan'.
I would also expect at least the same amount of assitance having been secured from the Canadian Federal government; perhaps by way of the BDC, other 'technological innovation program grants' and reimbursement type grants.
All this in addition to any and all requisite 'financial assitance' and support programs provided by Export Development Canada, on behalf of the Government of Canada.
Yes. It's a tall order alright; and yet, where there's the will there is the way Antlercarver.
Should NanoXplore and it's 'principal investors' and partners not have already secured all of what I have suggested as being preferred and requisite, I expect severe 'NanoXplore 'minority share holder dilution, or worse, a "no go" for VoltaXplore, could perhaps be what we could expect?
Tell Paradigm Capital that unless they have the "inside scoop", I would fire each and every person, specifically it's head of investments and their investments risk assessment officer, who would suggest placing any more capital than they were outright willing to lose on behalf of their clients, at a position with NanoXplore.
I could be absolutely wrong.
Never the less,the next company news release is either going to serve in clearly demonstrating a requisite 'derisking' of this GRA investment going forward; or such a news release is going to tell you that "The Sword of Damocles" has been let loose from that string which had been holding it above the nanoXplore 'minority share holder's respective positions.