RE:RE:RE:Qtr endNorthernTaco ,
I'm laughable you say? Now that's alaughable suggestion, lol!
Well then, are you also "laughing" at the NanoXplore share price having immense difficulty trying to break through that seemingly impenetrable $3.00 ceiling?
By the way, I didn't really state your opinion was outright wrong NorthernTaco. I merely suggested it could mean little, given NanoXplore's current share price points.
In regards to my enjoying the silence, I'll definitely do that.
After all, speakers who utter less supportable or inaccurate statements, such as your statement regarding NanoXplore's cash on hand and liquidity metrics, are not considered to be music for my ears.
Your inaccurate statements are more like the finger nails scratching a blackboard.
I'll reiterate for you that "Mr. Pierre-Yves Terrisse, Vice President of Corporate Development, had better bleeding well remind Mr. Soroush Nazarpour & Co that if NanoXplore is not made to "sizzle sexy" it's not likely to be considered as being hot by "the market".
Tell Mr. Nazarpour &Co that unless and until NanoXplore representatives are going to name the names of the company's VoltaXplore partners, along with the names of financiers/investors/customers assiting in the expansion of NanoXplore's "Graphene BlackTM" SMC product manufacturing capacity and the successful attainment of the five year plan objectives, the NanoXplore share price may continue to be briefly and "artificially massaged" upward; and yet, the NanoXplore story would not be closer to becoming "sizzling sexy for institutional investments managers and their respective clients.
Institutional investments managers and their respective clients together know what "artificially massaged" upward share price looks like and they simply have no episodes of Fear Of Missing Out.