NanoXplore Inc T.GRA

Specifically for Lire02, Mr Wolff @ Paradigm Capital et al.

[1student]

Lire02 stated, ". . . The company cannot be held ransom to some arbitrary price caused by an unsustained spike in the market price.( the short lived run to $9.) The fact is that all shareholders who have participated in previous equity and convertible debt raises have been and are currently quite amply rewarded. "

RESPONSE: There are actions and the lack thereof; then there are the requisite resulting consequesnces Lire02.
Absolutely nobody is holding the company "ransom to some arbitrary price caused by an unsustained spike in the market price.( the short lived run to $9.)"
It's simple really. There are "actions and the lack thereof; then there are the requisite resulting consequesnces", Lire02.

Here, allow me to put it the following way for you Lire02

When the GRA share price was jacked all the way up, by way of that professional institutional investment managers overseen, engineered and entirely "short lived run to $9.00", I did not, at that time, see Mr. Nazarpour &Co bother to emphasize the potential for a $500M capital raise being necessary at circa $9.00; nor was there, at that time, the intent to amend such a shelf prospectus, in order to raise much needed capital, at much higher share price points, so as to build out and operate 3-4  "Graphene BlackTM" production modules.
Again, actions or lack thereof and the required resulting consequences. Once again, keep this in mind Lire02.

What's more, I certainly didn't see Mr. Nazarpour &Co actually finding it in any way 'necessary' for the company's most senior representatives to 'publicly' emphasize the very fact being that NanoXplore was, at that time, to be included as a constituent of the MSCI Canada Small Cap Index; this whilst Mr. Nazarpour, along with other 'insiders' and their respective preferred 'friends & family', most certainly knew that the very reason the company's share price was being jacked up to $9.00, during that engineered and made to be "short lived run to $9.00", had everything to do with the various everyday professional institutional Index funds managers requisite purchases of and the requisite porportioned holding of the underlying securities which were, at that time, scheduled to be added to to said index, e.g. specifically Nanoxplore.
"There are actions or lack thereof and the required resulting consequences".

Hello Lire02, hello! Pay attention now Lire02. I'm  addressing you having asked me to retract statements which I recently made; statements which both you and I know are entirey accurate and had, at that time, been well warranted and indubitably supportable.

You do most certainly recall the quite intentional withholding of 'substantial' information from a certain 'minority' segment of NanoXplore share holders; information which would have, at that time, afforded GRA 'minority' share holders the requisite opportunity to have entirely relevant and crucially important information comprise and rightfully shape their respective decisions and their intent to either buy, sell or hold their respective NanoXplore share holdings, leading up to what clearly resulted in the engineered collapse and "professional institutional managers well prepared for consequent 'short selling' of GRA shares.
"There are actions or the lack thereof and the required resulting consequences arising therefrom".

I expect the preceding will do, in terms of addressing the kind of absolute poppycock which most senior NanoXplore principals and C-suite representatives are also most capable of demonstrating for specifically 'minority class NanoXplore share holders, n'est- ce pas Lire02?

"As to the future....Caveat Emptor toujours !"

[Lire02]

"As I previously stated, Mr. Soroush Nazarpour and the other insiders' would certainly be in some way entirely compensated for any and all  experienced dilution to their respective NanoXplore share positions, in the event of anywhere upward to $500M worth of GRA shares being issued, whether senior class A or B or otherwise. "1Student. There is absolutely No Evidence that

[1student]

Hello Lire02 You stated, "There is absolutely No Evidence that insiders ( or friends and family of insiders ) have  profitted illegally or unethically, ( or shall profit through future actions)  from actions taken or not taken by the Board in this specific case. To project some potential malfeasance to future actions is completely unwarranted and irresponsible. RESPONSE: Some one

[Lire02]

Clearly I disagree with your assessment of events. If you are so convinced of your positions then take some action. I , for one have had it with your trying to convert your assertions into facts. You go your way, I'll go mine. OK? 

[1student]

Have look at the share price at this moment. Is that action enough for you Lire02?

[Lire02]

Well, no actually. Share price has beeen well below this for most of Nanoxplore's history. I bought into this company with a medium term time horizon, and we're still at the formative stage. I fully understand this can and likely will head further south, but so will most other stocks I hold including the banks etc.  Where will the price be in 1 or 2 years ? I suspect significantly

[1student]

You have to ask yourself where the GRA price will be in the next 1 to 2 minutes? LOL!

[Lire02]

Why?

[JimmyBly1]

Lire#2, because Student's vision is based on movement, and the faster, the more he gets excited, either up or down. But he is right, this stock is no more liquid, it's just light fumes those days. Keep the windows closed im telling ya (and buy all the way). JimmyB

[goodbuddy]

It's pretty hard to discuss topics when a poster uses their MOOD RING COLORS to start a conversation about what they call is facts.

[antlercarver]

Here, here! Well said, @Lire02. Your analysis certainly seems consistent with my experience of the company and its leadership. 

[1student]

Hello Antlercarver. You stated, "Here, here! Well said, @Lire02. Your analysis certainly seems consistent with my experience of the company and its leadership.  RESPONSE: Your 'experience' is undoubtedly one fashioned with you having been 'informed' antlercarver; thus, I expect that you would always agree with others who, like you, have also fashioned opinions whilst