Gear Energy Ltd T.GXE

Enough Already

[geezer21]

Debate the issue but leave out the personality slanders.

[masfortuna]

Normally i would agree with that BUT he has no class. For there to be a debate, both parties need to support their sttaements.  He has not because his statements are not accurate. I provided my info directly from GXE and yet that wasn't good enough.  He has still to provide any info that indicates GXE cannot pay their dividend at these levels. 

[Roscoe747]

  The likely explanation for such rude behaviour is that these trolls are junior phone chimps at a brokerage whose 'special projects' include trying to influence more market activity by inciting an emotional response.  Longs are untouchable and cannot be scalped unless they trade. Traders want volume for their algos to attack. They use emotional attacks to incite selling.

[masfortuna]

Never thought of that Roscoe. I guess it might work but I haven't sold a single share of GXE since I bought 2 years ago.  I have added as I did  this week but only in small quantities.  In all fairness, I am disappointed with our sp at the moment but the divy helps. Gl!

[navajojoe]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[masfortuna]

Are you dumb? So oil drops and they make less money. That's a revelation to you? As I posted already, they have a net surplus. That net surplus wil decline if oil drops but it's not the samething as saying they can't afford the divy.  ***Where is your proof that they can't afford a divy?  You sir are a clown.

[navajojoe]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[masfortuna]

Sure they can use the surplus??? That's your answer??? So then they can pay the divy.  That was the argument. So basically you are contradicting yourself and admitting that your statement was false. Except you don't even see that lol! As for the name calling...You can't win an argument with a stupid person.  And FYI, If you had said  "If oil drops dramatically they

[navajojoe]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[masfortuna]

you keep changing your tune.  The argument was NOT whether using the surplus was sustainable. You keep moving the goalposts. That's why nobody is chiming in. You must be a real pleasure to be around at home :)

[navajojoe]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[masfortuna]

Sounds good "except" that's not what you said. NOT BEING ABLE TO PAY THE DIVY A THESE PRICES is what you said. Anyhow I am putting this to rest. If you don't think they can pay the divy and that is a concern for you, then go sell your shares. I have been buying at these levels and in about 2 weeks I will sell 15-20% higher. I keep that core intact that I bought 2 years ago which

[navajojoe]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[masfortuna]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy

[masfortuna]

And for good measure: Me a) Sounds good "except" that's not what you said. NOT BEING ABLE TO PAY THE DIVY A THESE PRICES is what you said.  You b) What I said: "At today's oil price they aren't making enough to pay the dividend." Both statements mean the same thing except you are too dumb to know that. STAY IN SCHOOL KIDS!

[navajojoe]

This post has been removed in accordance with Community Policy