Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

BetaPro Crude Oil Inverse Leveraged Daily Bear ETF T.HOD

Alternate Symbol(s):  HBTPF

ng of shareholders on July 2, 2020 (see Recent Developments). HOD's investment objective, which became effective at the close of business on July 9, 2020, is to seek daily investment resHOD's investment objective was changed after gaining approval at a meetiults, before fees, expenses, distributions, brokerage commissions and other transaction costs, that endeavour to correspond to up to two times (200%) the inverse (opposite) of the daily performance of the Horizons Crude Oil Rolling Futures Index (the Underlying Index, Bloomberg ticker: CMDYCLER). HOD is denominated in Canadian dollars. Any U.S. dollar gains or losses as a result of the ETFs investment are hedged back to the Canadian dollar to the best of its ability. In order to achieve this objective, the total underlying notional value of these instruments and/or securities will typically not exceed two times the total assets of the ETF. As such, HOD employs absolute leverage.


TSX:HOD - Post by User

Comment by Drainmancomethon Jul 19, 2009 8:14pm
161 Views
Post# 16149486

RE: Oil on its own today!!!

RE: Oil on its own today!!!As I started my last post I will continue with this one in saying that I mean no disrespect Tgarfield. Exchange of ideas is what this is all about and I appreciate your views .

You made some good points in your rebuttal and some that I felt were kind of missing my point. However, I agree that  governments are doing what they can in hopes of keeping the economies functioning in these difficult times. 

To counter some of your points:

1. I agree that the government cannot control things to a great degree but they  do exert a lot of influence with policies and programs. I believe many of the problems we are experiencing today are as a result of Government decisions on interest rate policies that were far to loose for too long, creating bubble after bubble. There is essentially no control (like the former gold discipline) over the monetary supply.  After the tech crash,  Instead of allowing some painful resetting from boom to bust they took us into this housing sector boom/collapse & financial crisis.

2. Lehmans was chosen as the fall guy and they were GS's chief rivals. You don't think Hank Paulson and the like had influence in this decision? All investment banks were in deep leverage with diminished asset bases,  not just Lehmans. Why do you think that JP Morgan and GS (investment banks) magically applied for and immediately were approved to become commercial banks, but to qualify for TARP payout to shore up their asset bases and avoid collapse.
 
3. You say that no-one is in trouble with depreciated home values unless they have to refinance or sell. That is like saying that no-one is the poorer with their portfolios as long as they do not sell depreciated stocks. How many trillions have been lost in the past year? It took 25 years to re-take the market highs after the 29 crash. It can happen again & it is naive to think it is impossible.  Another problem with all this is of course a good chunk of consumerism and economy in the States and Canada was finance from home equity. A nice game as long as prices go up ...but now not so good when you owe 20-40% more than the home is worth.

4. Of course the government(s) did not want this crisis but they do bear a good deal of responsibility for creating it. They should have led away from pitfalls not help us along the way (loosening mortgage rules, persistent low interest rates).


Potential solutions IMO:

-  the deleveraging process should be allowed to take place so that  we can return to sustainable growth, not leveraged to the teeth with make-believe money and enormous debt.

- personal savings should be encouraged. A country of savers builds that country's wealth and a country of  borrowers will put that country in the poor house. We need reasonable interest rates that rewards savers and does not promote more bad debt.

-Ultimately, people (and companies)  need to take responsibility for their own financial decisions and not expect government bailouts with borrowed money that will likely never be paid back.


Take care,

Drainman




Bullboard Posts